[deepamehta-devel] Javadoc

[Enrico Schnepel]

Hi,

> (1) javadoc compatible (no compromise there!)
and it knows some more javadoc tags as javadoc itself does
you could document groups of functions for example.

> (2) integrated in eclipse
http://eclox.eu/
I am prefering the command line way...
what about an automated checkout and a doxygen build on a nighly basis.
the build log could be also send to the dev-list if the where errors in the 
build. - continious integration! and... if we have some unit tests these may 
run too.

> (3) easy to set up
using a wizard - it is

> So, why don't we use both of them, javadoc and doxygen? It's not that
> much work, at least with javadoc. And if we see, after some time, that
> there is only one documentation used, we could easily skip the other
> then.
this would double the information and it would make no sense to me if i would 
see two documentation links on the website.

> In my opinion it is important that there's a documentation in the code
> at all, and that it is done in a widely used and accepted
> standard/style. Anything that helps as a motivation to do this is
> welcome.
+1

Enrico
-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit Binärdaten wurde abgetrennt...
Dateiname   : signature.asc
Dateityp    : application/pgp-signature
Dateigröße  : 189 bytes
Beschreibung: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL         : <http://lists.deepamehta.de/mailman/private/devel-lists.deepamehta.de/attachments/20080313/8a07b232/attachment.pgp>